Monday, March 14, 2005
Bush in 60
I was in Cancun this last week and had the opportunity to speak with family members and friends that I have not seen in a while. More to the point, I talked alot with people with whom I rarely speak including a number of Canadians seeking a little sunlight.
There are still actually people who think that history will judge Bush as the worst President of the last 100 years. While I am not quite sure what "history" really is other than a word that makes the feminists burn with righteous anger, let's just define it, in this case, as what we all learned in law school as the "Reasonable Person." The reality, and inasmuch my opinion, is that history will judge Bush as not one of the bes, but the best President since Lincoln.
Resolve is a much hated quality in a leader or foe yet the application of that quality to freeing not only one's own people from the fear of immolation at the hands of crazed jihadists, but doing so whilst also freeing the jihadist from the insane political system(s) that fuel and color his anger is bound to be honored and lauded in time.
I know that those with less of a spine to sacrifice or ability and inclination to rally behind the right cause hate those with the opposite attributes, namely resolve and moral clarity. However, those that hate others for their good can only be what? evil, morally bankrupt, valueless, progressive democrats? I'm taking other suggestions.
There are still actually people who think that history will judge Bush as the worst President of the last 100 years. While I am not quite sure what "history" really is other than a word that makes the feminists burn with righteous anger, let's just define it, in this case, as what we all learned in law school as the "Reasonable Person." The reality, and inasmuch my opinion, is that history will judge Bush as not one of the bes, but the best President since Lincoln.
Resolve is a much hated quality in a leader or foe yet the application of that quality to freeing not only one's own people from the fear of immolation at the hands of crazed jihadists, but doing so whilst also freeing the jihadist from the insane political system(s) that fuel and color his anger is bound to be honored and lauded in time.
I know that those with less of a spine to sacrifice or ability and inclination to rally behind the right cause hate those with the opposite attributes, namely resolve and moral clarity. However, those that hate others for their good can only be what? evil, morally bankrupt, valueless, progressive democrats? I'm taking other suggestions.
